prettylink
Chickens Secondary Header
728x90 header

AUSTRALIAN SOCIAL SECURITY CRIMES : BASIC CONCEPTS AND UNDERSTANDINGS FOR NON-LEGAL PRACTITIONERS

This is the Official Online (Youtube) Release of “Zeitgeist: Moving Forward” by Peter Joseph. [30 subtitles ADDED!] On Jan. 15th, 2011, “Zeitgeist: Moving Forward” was released theatrically to sold out crowds in 60 countries; 31 languages; 295 cities and 341 Venues. It has been noted as the largest non-profit independent film release in history. This is a non-commercial work and is available online for free viewing and no restrictions apply to uploading/download/posting/linking – as long as no money is exchanged. A Free DVD Torrent of the full 2 hr and 42 min film in 30 languages is also made available through the main website [below], with instructions on how one can download and burn the movie to DVD themselves. His other films are also freely available in this format. Website: www.zeitgeistmovingforward.com http Release Map: zeitgeistmovingforward.com DVD: zeitgeistmovie.com Movement: www.thezeitgeistmovement.com

INTENTION IN THE CRIME PARTICIPATION IN AUSTRALIAN SOCIAL SECIRITY

 

Australian government do provide various forms of social security support for those eligible citizens and residents that require specific care, mainly in the form of financial welfare.[1]  However, such payment from the government of Commonwealth Australia could be easily subjected to abuse, whether intentionally or unintentionally, by the claimant that approached Centrelink Australia for financial assistance and concession card application in order to cover the high living cost of Australia, mainly on short term basis.[2]  The potential crimes that could be convicted are mainly of white collar[3], that are mainly committed by people employed in the clerical and professional occupation or related to the person engaged in administrative or clerical rather than manual work.  Commonwealth Australia Director of Public Prosecution will need to prove the mens rea, or the root of the formation of the conspiracy with clear intent to commit crime, factors of the instigation towards the crime commission by the conspirator, precise contemplation of unlawful agreement etc, before charging the defendants in the criminal list of the law court.[4]  The same principle is hold for any crime, that analogized abetting and aiding liability to one who counsels, procures or command one another in crime commission.  In Australia, there are different established crime-related legislations that could cater the related offences, including the social security matters.[5] 

 

 

 

 

 

EVIDENCES OF SOCIAL SECURITY FRAUD IN AUSTRALIA

 

Director of Public Prosecution (DPP) of Commonwealth Australia would normally sue the defendant of presumed criminal via information collected from the relevant fraud investigation team.  However, cross examination of the evidences submitted may often offer unsatisfactory methods by opening the door to otherwise damaging and inadmissible information that the government agents learnt from the Centrelink’s investigators.[6]  Example of inadmissible evidence is intercept evidence, such as evidence of a telephone conversation between the defendants in criminal conspiracy, is not accepted in English law.[7]  Obtaining information about the fraud engaged by the defendants illegally could breach human rights and privacy, and controversial raised whether evidence obtained by illegal or improper means should be admitted or rejected at court trial.[8]  If the breach has began from the part of the plaintiff or Commonwealth Australia Director of Public Prosecution (DPP), by collecting information of private life of the defendant, obtaining bank statement and social security communication details, that maybe irrelevant to the source of dispute, then the information collected by Centrelink Australia Fraud Investigation Team maybe excluded in law court submission. [9]  If such prosecution is allowed then overprosecution and management failures might occur in the part of the related government department of plaintiff, causing wastage of government and law court resources to sue the potentially innocent defendant for small mistakes, leading to inefficiencies when Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) has not even

It's only fair to share...Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterPin on PinterestShare on Google+Digg this

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Comments are closed.

Chickens Secondary Header
728x90 header
prettylink
Search the Site
Script to Sales
film contracts
music-legal
Chicken Pens and Runs
Application Selection
Manfreedkitchen