728x90 header
Chickens Secondary Header

Posts Tagged ‘Pardons’

A Brief Overview of Pardons

A pardon is the legal way of receiving forgiveness for a crime and the penalty assigned with it. It is typically granted by a sovereign power such as the President or the governor of a state. In many cases, pardons are associated with clemency, although they are different. Clemency lessens the penalty of a crime without forgiving the crime itself. The act of granting clemency is known as a reprieve.

In some instances, pardons are offered to people who have been wrongfully convicted. When this occurs, the offer is frequently refused. It is refused because it is seen in many cases as an admission of guilt. It is hard to forgive someone who has done nothing wrong. In these cases, individuals generally prefer to go through appeals to have their sentence overturned.

The President of the United States has the power to issue pardons by virtue of the Constitution. In particular, Article II, Section 2 grants the president the power “to grant reprieves and pardons for offenses against the United States, except in cases of impeachment.” The Supreme Court has interpreted this as saying that the President also has the power to grant pardons, conditional pardons, commutation of a sentence, a conditional commutation of a sentence, remissions of fines and forfeitures, respites, and amnesties.

Any and all federal pardon petitions are addressed to the president. Once they have made it through the Pardon Attorney’s office and to the President’s desk, the President has the power either to grant the request or to deny the request.

In many instances, a Presidential pardon may end up being controversial. Some controversial pardons include President Ford’s pardon of President Nixon, President Andrew Johnson’s sweeping pardons of former Confederate officials and military personnel following the Civil War, President George H.W. Bush’s pardons for 6 Reagan administration officials involved with the Iran-Contra affair, and President Clinton’s pardons for convicted FALN terrorists and billionaire fugitive Marc Rich.

When seeking a federal pardon, the Department of Justice recommends waiting at least 5 years after a conviction. The office receives roughly 600 pardon petitions each year and roughly 10% are granted. The number varies from administration to administration, but, generally, there have been fewer pardons granted in the administrations after World War 2.

The majority of the time, the Pardon Attorney will only consider petitions from people who have completed their sentences and also demonstrated an ability to lead a responsible, respectable, and productive life. The President’s pardon power extends only to Federal law; however, many state governors or special boards can grant pardons under state law.

For more information on pardons, please visit

Joseph Devine

Article Source:

watch in HQ ok i reuploaded it because youtube removed it. NOT GOOD! and i put the disclamer on it too. oh well. December 20th: i was board and needed something to do. and i ended up with this. as if it isn’t alredy oveis “pardon my bad spelling” this video saports the couple Ikuto and Amu. hope you all like it. enjoy THIS IS A FAN MADE VIDEO. I DO NOT OWN THE ANIME OR THE SONG. I GIVE FULL CREDIT TO THE OWNERS. PLEASE YOUTUBE DON’T REMOVE THIS FAN MADE VIDEO. thank you

Question by ?: Key Board?
pardon my sucking ENG!
whats based on persian computer key boards versification?

Best answer:

Answer by Rich Z
This is as close as I can get

Give your answer to this question below!

Decision-making guidelines and procedures for parole granting, parole revocation, and pardons

Decision-making guidelines and procedures for parole granting, parole revocation, and pardons

Price: [wpramaprice asin=”B007F6MBNG”]

[wpramareviews asin=”B007F6MBNG”]

Song: Bach – Sleepers Wake Okay. Here’s a Rocketeer by FEM parody video. =) Honestly, all of us are amatuers in this MV making thing. So pardon us for any mistakes. This video is made for fun and obviously to promote pumpRockr as you guys may see it alot in the video. Its a 3 wheeled board. Do check em’ out at Thanks to all the people who spent time to make this video. Credits: (Names following FB names =D So if you like any of them, add them. LOL) Directors – Zaki Hussain, Isa Abdillah Video Editors – Zaki Hussain, Isa Abdillah, Syakina Hassan Sound Engineer – Jed Izaki Singer & Rapper: Isa Abdillah, Dee Kosh Actors: Zam Hairis, Syakina Hassan, Zul Lah, Ralph Tomen, She Joy, Chris Yong Hao Special Thanks to Randy Zhang for his camera, and Syarif Kidal for his presence in our shoot. =P Hope you guys enjoy this vid! PS: I can finally sleep..

Find More Pardon Board Articles

Necessity Of Pardons And Waivers For An Individual With A Criminal Record

With continuous technological advancements in multiple sectors, many techniques have emerged with the help of which it has become quite easier to find out the criminals associated with a particular crime. Digital fingerprinting is one of the techniques that has made the process of identifying a criminal less complicated. Unlike the examination that were done earlier, the accuracy rate of the digital mode of testing the fingerprints has been found to be quite effective in figuring out the exact culprit associated with a particular crime. Once you are regarded as a criminal by these testing techniques, it would become difficult for you to continue the same standard of social life that you followed earlier until and unless you receive pardons and waivers from the respective states.

If you commit a crime with a belief that you would not be caught, remember that the modern digital fingerprinting techniques will help the police and legal officials prove your guilt with utmost accuracy. A criminal record does not only stain your social life, but professional life as well. It appears to be an impediment for the places where you live and work. Thus, if you want yourself to stay away from any kind of criminal charges, don’t ever think of doing anything wrong. However, there is a group of people who hardly listen to their conscience and commit crimes as a result of which they have to look for pardons and waivers in order to remove such stains from their image.

Being declared as a criminal after the results of digital fingerprinting or other methods, affect every aspect of an individual’s life including his socio-economic well-being. There are issues where once the culprit has been litigated, but then again the case has been dropped. Even in such matters, the convict is considered to have non-conviction criminal record. Obtaining pardons and waivers help these individuals to manage their stained records to some extent and avoid their social and economic life from being hampered because of such charges.

As soon as pardon is issued to an individual, his name as a criminal is removed from all the systems from which it could be searched. Within thirty days of the pardon issuance, your name from the criminal records are deleted. The pardon board also issues a directive to all the federal agencies conveying the message of their action so that the databases could be updated, thereby implementing this policy properly. Pardon is issued in Canada, and hence your name a s a criminal could not be removed from the data of U.S. Customs and Border Services on the basis of Canadian issuance. Thus, to remove your criminal records from everywhere including the United States, it is necessary to obtain US waiver. This shows the importance of the pardons and waivers services in clearing the criminal charges from one’s record.

Getting a stable job that can offer stronger financial base for future is one of the most significant aims of every individual. But being declared as a criminal after digital fingerprinting test makes it difficult for the employers to recruit such individuals. Obtaining pardons and waivers from Canada and US respectively makes it convenient for these individuals to a great extent to get a better job alternative for a wealthy livelihood.

Angel Brown works in forensic department and have sound knowledge in digital fingerprinting and pardons and waivers. For more information he recommends you to visit

More Music Videos: +++ Chattanooga Choo Choo Lyrics CHATTANOOGA CHOO CHOO Glenn Miller – from “Sun Valley Serenade” – words by Mack Gordon, music by Harry Warren Pardon me, boy Is that the Chattanooga choo choo? Track twenty-nine Boy, you can gimme a shine I can afford To board a Chattanooga choo choo I’ve got my fare And just a trifle to spare You leave the Pennsylvania Station ’bout a quarter to four Read a magazine and then you’re in Baltimore Dinner in the diner Nothing could be finer Than to have your ham an’ eggs in Carolina When you hear the whistle blowin’ eight to the bar Then you know that Tennessee is not very far Shovel all the coal in Gotta keep it rollin’ Woo, woo, Chattanooga there you are There’s gonna be A certain party at the station Satin and lace I used to call “funny face” She’s gonna cry Until I tell her that I’ll never roam So Chattanooga choo choo Won’t you choo-choo me home? Chattanooga choo choo Won’t you choo-choo me home? +++ Terminal Station in Chattanooga, Tennessee is a former railroad station, once owned and operated by the Southern Railway, listed on the National Register of Historic Places. The station was opened in 1909 and was the latest and largest station in Chattanooga’s history. The original Chattanooga Union Station, built in 1858, (demolished in 1973) was outgrown by the rapid expansion in the railroad network serving Chattanooga. A second station, built in 1882, was outgrown in only six years. In 1888, an old
Video Rating: 4 / 5

Question by mothers love: i need word perfect now to write a legal letter?
I need to ewrit a letter to Juvinile Judge and the board a pardon I want it to be perfect it needs to be in asap please help me IM not a good speller

Best answer:

Answer by rtfm
You don’t need Word Perfect, which is a nearly obsolete word processing program. If you honestly don’t have any kind of word processing software on your computer (no Microsoft Word? no Wordpad?) then you can download Open Office for free from their Web site:

It’s very similar to Microsoft Word, especially for something simple like a basic letter.

Don’t worry so much about your format or spelling. Worry more about the content of the letter. That’s what the judge will be looking for.

Give your answer to this question below!
Okla. DA accuses board of open meeting violations
Oklahoma County District Attorney David Prater is accusing the Pardon and Parole Board of violating the state's Open Meeting Act. Prater delivered a nine-page letter Wednesday to the board's executive director, Terry Jenks. It alleges the board …
Read more on Shawnee News Star

Annual report of the State Board of Pardons of the state of Montana [FACSIMILE]

Annual report of the State Board of Pardons of the state of Montana [FACSIMILE]

FACSIMILE REPRODUCTION: 1890Annual report of the State Board of Pardons of the state of Montana [FACSIMILE] Originally published by Helena, Mont. : C.K. Wells Co in 1890. Book will be printed in black and white, with grayscale images. Book will be 6 inches wide by 9 inches tall and soft cover bound. Any foldouts will be scaled to page size. If the book is larger than 1000 pages, it will be printed and bound in two parts. Due to the age of the original titles, we cannot be held responsible for mi

Price: [wpramaprice asin=”B008NE1Y82″]

[wpramareviews asin=”B008NE1Y82″]

Find More Pardon Board Articles

Canadian Pardons And Waivers For Canadians

The United States takes its duties of security on borders very seriously indeed, so it is in one’s best interest to cover all bases, especially if one has a criminal record. It may be only a small infringement, but it may also be enough to get one deported or arrested. Canadian pardons are the surest way to avoid this embarrassing scenario. Finding out about them is almost the first step after the penalty has been served

In these times of economic instability, with companies down-sizing, why run that risk? Losing one’s job, or being unable to do it properly, because one has not bothered to look into the future is really rather stupid. If one puts the machinery in motion once one has fully paid the penalty, fine or whatever, once one has been convicted, the better.

A holiday with friends or relatives in the United States sounds great. But one cannot go, because one has a conviction, small or not. Then go look for a Canadian pardon and, preferably, if appropriate, a waiver. Sometimes a pardon may not be enough to avoid detention by itself. So the waiver is necessary to cover this glitch, and keep everything moving.

Be aware that these articles take a while, as most things relating to justice. Expect a wait of several months to prepare a waiver, and another half to three-quarters of a year, before the request is submitted to Homeland Security, and they act on it. There are no exceptions, even for minor misdemeanors. And there is really no way to hasten it up, in ordinary circumstances.

Running the risk of crossing the border with a record is illegal. One can be grabbed, arrested, jailed, and deported, if an agent of Homeland Security has suspicions about one. Add that to the fact one may lose car and possessions, even if one does not own them, and one can be in a real pickle. Therefore, it makes much sense to put in motion a quest for a pardon and a waiver as soon as possible.

Canadian pardons from the Canadian Parole Board are not recognised in the United States government. A waiver is therefore needed to clear this problem. Once one has these in their purse or wallet, then one should be able to enjoy oneself on holiday or for whatever reason one has for being there.

Another point to remember is if one overstays one’s allotted time in the United States and is caught, one will be detained and subjected to criminal charges. It is most probable, after attending court, one will be banned from the United States for anything between one and ten years. And once one is in the Homeland Security Criminal database system once there is no clearance time. One is in forever.

To obtain Canadian pardons and waivers, consult the Canadian Pardon services. They do not supply legal advice, so it may be best to seek help from a solicitor first. Then, if necessary, take the solicitor along with one. Being such a serious matter, it is best to follow the appropriate steps exactly.

Pardon services specializes in assisting any person with criminal records to obtain the Canadian Pardon and the U.S. Entry Restriction Waivers.

Article Source:

Question by luv2read: Seeking an Indiana attorney who has experience with expungements.?
I pled no contest to burglary 30 yrs ago (at age 19) and was placed on probation until 21. I now have a graduate degree and hold a professional position. There are no other criminal charges. My research indicates that the only way to get a true expungement, as opposed to simply having records sealed, is to receive a recommendation from the Parole Board to receive a pardon from the governor. Once a pardon is received, expungement is allowed.

This conviction has haunted me for the last three decades.
I’m a single woman who lives alone. My home was burglarized about 1 1/2 years ago. I cannot even purchase a firearm or get a gun permit for self-defense because of something that happened in 1977. My work involves being around adult male felons – another reason I’d like protection in my home. I’ve checked the usual places for referrals (Bar Assocation, etc.). I’m at a loss and would be grateful for the name of an Indiana attorney with experience in this area.

Best answer:

Answer by Jason m
I have attached a link for you. There are tons of attorneys on this search so I would just pick a few and call around. Good luck and its nice to see people turn a different leaf if you know what I mean.

Give your answer to this question below!
More than 500 new laws take effect Wednesday
The pardon and parole boards are being merged. People who report child sexual abuse to authorities now have whistleblower protection. Most noticeable to teenagers and their parents may be the boosted number of hours of training required for new drivers.
Read more on FOX 8 News WVUE-TV

Projection of the TDC admissions, 1984-1990

Projection of the TDC admissions, 1984-1990

Price: [wpramaprice asin=”B000711E3O”]

[wpramareviews asin=”B000711E3O”]

My parents taught me right from wrong. As head of the Pardon and Parole Board I tried to make it easier for victims. As a judge I listened to both sides before making a decision. As a State Representative I worked with either political party that had a good idea. And being Lt. Governor makes me the most qualified person in the Governor’s race. As Governor we’ll do the right thing, together.
Video Rating: 5 / 5

Vetoes, Parliaments and Pardons: The Royal Prerogative

Elizabeth II is the Head of State of the United Kingdom and fifteen other member states of the Commonwealth of Nations. These countries are constitutional monarchies, meaning that they operate under an essentially democratic constitution, the Queen’s principal role being to represent the state. Very often, she is viewed as a symbolic and apolitical personage with no real power. But is this entirely true? Does the Queen really possess purely nominal authority, or can she in fact exercise her will in any public action? This is not an easy question to answer. I will attempt to do so by focusing mainly on one of her most important theoretical prerogatives: the right to grant or deny royal assent to laws passed by Parliament.

A difficulty in judging the extent of the authority presently held by the monarchy lies in the fact that the British constitution has not been codified into one single document and much of it remains unwritten. The extensive power that the monarch once indisputably possessed, including the right to administer justice, dissolve Parliament or pardon crimes, was largely a matter of common law and not statute. What laws were codified (the Bill of Rights of 1689 and the Act of Settlement of 1701 standing among the most important) served more to restrict the Monarch’s power than to entrench it. Thus, the residual powers still reserved to the Queen continue to be more a matter of constitutional convention than of written rules. Formally, no Act of the British Parliament becomes a proper law until it is given assent by the Queen. Yet in practice, Elizabeth II assents to all bills, irrespective of her opinion on them. The last time a British monarch rejected a law was in 1708, when Queen Anne vetoed the Scottish Militia Bill, and even then, she did so at the request of her ministers. Since then, the right of royal assent has fallen into disuse, leading some constitutional theorists to claim that a new convention obligating the monarch to assent to all bills has arisen. This view was famously stressed by Walter Bagehot in his 1867 volume “The English Constitution”:

“…the Queen has no such veto. She must sign her own death-warrant if the two Houses unanimously send it up to her. It is a fiction of the past to ascribe to her legislative power. She has long ceased to have any.”

In earlier generations, such a bold assertion of the monarch’s supposed lack of power would have been unpardonable. Even I see some flaws in this theory. For one thing, the only evidence on which it stands (besides Bagehot’s claim) is custom. Even if all the monarchs since Queen Anne have assented to all bills presented to them, there is no formal change in any official policy that would indicate that the practice will be followed for the next bill. Additionally, if the Queen decided to withhold assent to a bill, what legal mechanism could force her to do otherwise? It would seem to me that in such an event, the veto could only be effectively circumvented by some kind of revolutionary act – as a minimum, by the Government refusing to respect the veto, which would undoubtedly lead to a constitutional crisis.

The situation is more clear-cut in Canada, which, unlike the United Kingdom, has a constitution that is largely written. The Constitution Act, 1867 clearly delineates the powers of the Crown. According to Section 55 of the Act, when the Governor General (the Queen’s representative in Canada) is presented with a bill that has been passed by Parliament, he may declare that he assents to it in the Queen’s name, that he withholds his assent, or that he reserves the bill for the “signification of the Queen’s pleasure” (letting the Queen decide the matter; according to Section 57, she may do so within two years after the Governor General receives the bill). Furthermore, as per Section 56, the “Queen in Council” (the Queen acting on the advice of her Privy Council) may disallow a law assented to by the Governor General within two years after receiving a copy of the law. Therefore, the Queen, together with the Governor General, does have the formal authority to veto a law passed by the Canadian Parliament. Nevertheless, no Governor General has done this since Confederation in 1867, although some provincial Lieutenant Governors have vetoed provincial laws or reserved them to the pleasure of the Governor General (under the authority of Section 90 of the Constitution Act, 1867). This happened most recently in 1963 when Saskatchewan’s Lieutenant Governor Frank Bastedo reserved a bill.

On top of that, there are instances in recent Commonwealth history of other royal prerogatives being directly exercised by the Crown against a government’s wishes. Depending on the country, the crown may have extensive official powers, including the appointment of ministers, granting of pardons for eliminating criminal records, or calling an early election, and some of these have been exercised in person, especially during unclear political situations. A classic example is Governor General Byng’s 1926 refusal to call a very early election at the request of Canadian Liberal Prime Minister William Lyon Mackenzie King, who wished to remain in power despite the stronger footing of the Conservative party in Parliament. Byng refused to do so; King was incensed by this supposed infringement on democracy, but Byng stood his ground. Another famous example was the dismissal of Prime Minister Gough Whitlam by Australian Governor General John Kerr during the 1975 Australian constitutional crisis. Whitlam’s controversial government did not have control of both houses of Parliament and he petitioned Kerr to call a half-senate election. Instead, Kerr dismissed him and appointed Malcolm Fraser, the leader of the Opposition, in his place.

The fact that the royal prerogative is rarely exercised, if at all, by the Queen and her representatives, appears to be more the product of a conventional good will on their part than an actual legal requirement. I hope Bagehot would pardon me if I surmised that he overdid it when he claimed that the Queen “must sign her own death-warrant”; what he was speaking about was more a matter of everyday practice as he saw it than a real summary of the standing law. After all, the monarchy seeks to stay popular and in today’s age of democracy, its very existence depends on public approval.

Ned Lecic writes for a pardons agency in Toronto. He also enjoys writing in his spare time, including on legal topics.

Article Source:

Ke$ ha - Your Love Is My Drug + Lyrics

-READ WHOLE DESC. FIRST.* Yeshh, I know. I haven’t uploaded a REAL LYRICS video in the longest. Pardon me, sorry d: I finished this video like last weekend but WMM was acting retarded due to the images I used so I took em all off today and did em all again and took screenshots of em and WAAH LA. Here’s the video. Clever, huh? It may not me as great as how it was before I took all the cool moving sparkling images, but I tried my best to make it work, so here it is. Sorry if it’s to crappy for you. Oh and it was requested by x3dinorawrrx . Sorry megan for uploading it so lateee D: Lovee yah guys. Gotta love Ke$ ha. By the by, it’s pronounced KEHH SHAH. Not key shah. That’s how I thought back in September lol. But we all make mistakes. Byee loves x3 PROGRAM USED// Windows Movie Maker BACKGROUNDS USED// I made some, screenshoted, Google. *if you ask what font this is, i’m gunna go to bollywood island, throw myself in the water, swim 14 miles, stop, go back to the island, find my computer, smash it with a hammer, and throw it in the water. [i used a crapload of fonts, kay? i’m not gunna list ’em all. if you want fonts, go to . PLZNTHX.] -sorry if i sounded mean, haha. i don’t mean to o: ask me stuff on my formspring!
Video Rating: 4 / 5

Question by In advance I ask you to pardon the dumb question. What is the proper way to use a manual clutch?
We often think that we know, but in order to have a clutch last for many, many miles what is the best practice? Please inform.

Best answer:

Answer by alvarz
when you are driving down the rod do not let your foot rest on the clutch pedal. keep it on the floor

Know better? Leave your own answer in the comments!
Pardon My F*?#$ ! French
Pardon My F*?#$ ! French. Shane Green July 25, 2012. zx. Are bad language, swearing, cussing, profanity, impiety and blasphemy part of being Australian? IN HINDSIGHT, Craig Symes realised he shouldn't have gone to work that early summer day in 2011.
Read more on Sydney Morning Herald

Pardon My Dust

Pardon My Dust

List Price: $ 0.99

Price: [wpramaprice asin=”B00168JA1K”]

[wpramareviews asin=”B00168JA1K”]

This is a parody of the song All I Do is Win! You can download it for free here! Thanks to everyone who helped me film: Alefnull SatoriLove djrodw Imperialistic diegogriff Mhykol If I missed someone let me know!! All I do is dig dig dig No matter what Got diamonds on my mind I cant never get enough And everytime I step into the mine shaft everybody’s picks go up and they stay there and they stay there up down, up down, up down All I do is dig, dig, dig So if you going in put your picks in the air make em stay there Yo it’s HOJ mining deep on the verse Cause I’ve never been a griefer and I won’t start now Keep your picks up, moon is in the sky, and we gotta lotta mining so we won’t stop now I never went nowhere They sayin Hoj is back Time is like a creeper It gave a sneak attack Now I got this brand new track, so I’ll spit this brand new flow My pick goes up and down, I got a while to go For diamonds I am searching, all night long we working Homies playing creeper defense, I just wish we were up on the surface Dont ever count us out Ya’ll better count us in Got 20 diamond stacks, That’s just where it begins Find diamonds everyday, and ride off on my pig Cause all I do, all I, all I, all I All I do is… CHORUS Diggin in my mine shaft Head on a swivel Looking for those mobs in sneak mode Dog comes when I whistle as I ride out on my saddled pig Man i’m just a passenger, can’t steer it, I got dirt to dig Tell this pig to back it up, My miner’s call me Loco It’s
Video Rating: 4 / 5

A Pardons Process for a Moose: Animal Trials

There is a humorous tradition in Washington DC that involves a pardons process by the President for one turkey at Thanksgiving. The bird, which is donated by a hatchery, is introduced to the President, who gives it a last-minute reprieve and sends it to live out its life in a petting zoo or sanctuary. Recently, Pete the Moose, who had been raised on an elk farm in Vermont, was the subject of his own “pardons process” when Governor Peter Shumlin gave ownership of the moose to the farm; normally, wild animals are in the public trust and under other circumstances, Pete, who was not born on the farm, might have had to be subjected to game animal culling. These stories may strike us as cute, but they hearken back to a time when the criminal law could actually be applied to animals as well as people.

Trials of animals were a surprisingly common practice in the middle ages. According to the prevailing mentality at the time, an animal bore the same moral responsibility for its actions as a human, and could therefore be called to answer for its actions before an ecclesiastic (or civil) court of law. Defendants at the time ranged from dogs, cats and rats to invertebrate pests like ants, usually for harming a human plaintiff in some way. Pigs were a common subject of criminal trials; they used to roam semi-wild around villages and could go in and out of houses, biting children in the process. Today, it would seem plain to us that the responsibility in the matter rests upon the farmer, but in a 1494 French case, for example, a pig entered a house and mutilated a child’s face, whereupon the child died. Predictably, the pig was sentenced to death. This in itself is not so surprising, as even today, many animals that harm people are destroyed. What is remarkable is the fact that moral and criminal responsibility was assigned to the animals, which, conversely, were given a full trial in court, during which they were entitled to lawyers and to be fed while in prison, just like a human.

As can be expected, animals on trial were usually found guilty. But sometimes, a defence would be successful. In Medieval Toulouse, France, a man was once charged with bestiality for having sex with his donkey. As was common at the time, the donkey was charged as well! The man was sentenced to death; according to the prevailing custom, the donkey might have been convicted as well. Luckily for her, many people stepped forward with the (logical) testimony that she was not a willing participant in the act, resulting in her acquittal.

Animal trials continued into the 18th century and, sometimes into the 19th. A much more recent case has been a source of controversy as to its facts. In 1924, Pep, the dog of Pennsylvania Governor Gifford Pinchot was “imprisoned” in Eastern State Penitentiary, Philadelphia. The story is that the Governor had had Pep sentenced to life imprisonment for killing the Pinchots’ cat and according to prison records, “criminal” Pep was actually issued a convict number (C2559). It appears likely, however, that Pep’s “crime” is a later embellishment of the story from a newspaper article, and that Pinchot had merely donated the dog to the prison in order to provide companionship for inmates. On the other hand, as recently as 1906 in Switzerland, a man and his son were charged with murder together with their dog as a “willing accomplice”. While the human defendants were given life sentences, the dog was sentenced to death.

In the civilized world, at least, we seem to have gotten over the notion that an animal can bear criminal responsibility. But on the other hand, many people today believe in recognizing rights for animals. What exactly these rights should include is a matter of contention; to some it mainly concerns the right to be free from cruelty on the part of humans, while others would grant animals equal rights to life with people and there is even a movement to give great apes (which are biologically classified together with humans in the family Hominidae) legal personhood. Should animals be given more rights in law, is it possible that they will also be given more responsibility, such as criminal responsibility? Also, while it may seem absurd to charge an animal with bestiality or bring termites to trial for infesting a house, could some kind of trial process be instituted, for example, to assess whether a dog should be destroyed for attacking a person, considering the animal’s (and its handler’s) side of the story against the charge? These might be questions to think about the next time a turkey receives an official pardons process at Thanksgiving or a wild animal is subjected “to a pardons process” in order to be released from the hunt.

Ned Lecic writes for a pardons agency in Toronto.

Article Source:

Aap Ki Kasam

Rajesh Khanna plays Mumtaz jealous husband who begins to doubt her fidelity when his best friend Sanjeev Kumar enters their lives. She is unable to convince Rajesh Khanna that she loves only him. He leaves her not knowing that she is pregnant with his child. Depressed and confused Rajesh Khanna becomes a homeless wanderer while Mumtaz remarries to provide a secure home for her child.
Video Rating: 4 / 5

Question by rentslave: How soon will Mumia be free once Obama loses in 2012?
No President who loses the popular vote and is defeated for re-election has ever again attempted to run for President.What is to stop Obama from pardoning Wesley Cook,a cause celebre of the extreme left?

Best answer:

Answer by ddd Peppddde
Wow its a genuine fox news dipshit spouting nonsense and not even trying to seem sane or level headed. This is always fun

BTW Obama is probably at the low point of his presidency. Even so things would have to get wwwwaaayyyy worse for him to lose to anyone of the possible POG crapidates

What do you think? Answer below!
Pardon Me, But Your Liberties Are Stepping on My Freedoms
And if we want to live in a society that is free from fear, we cannot have guns so readily available that anyone with a Joker fantasy can gun down scores of innocents in a movie theatre. So the question of which gun regulations should be put in place …
Read more on Huffington Post

A Familiar Dialogue Between Eve And Mary: Concerning The Free Pardon Of Sins, Through The Precious Blood Of Jesus Christ (1757)

A Familiar Dialogue Between Eve And Mary: Concerning The Free Pardon Of Sins, Through The Precious Blood Of Jesus Christ (1757)

This book is a facsimile reprint and may contain imperfections such as marks, notations, marginalia and flawed pages.

List Price: $ 30.95

Price: [wpramaprice asin=”1161842136″]

[wpramareviews asin=”1161842136″]

A brief video on the wonders of Open Source audio recording using Hydrogen drums & Ardour…all samples manipulated via Audacity & Jackbeat. This is my first video on Open Source Hip Hop Production. Pardon the amateur vid production work. More videos to come soon..enjoy..and as always Peace!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Video Rating: 5 / 5

728x90 header
Chickens Secondary Header
Search the Site
film contracts
Chicken Pens and Runs
Script to Sales
Application Selection